Make your own free website on Tripod.com
CPS reform

2

Home
156 S.W.3d 574 IN RE S.A.P.
135 S.W. 3d 165 IN RE S.A.P.
80 S.W. 3d 232 IN RE J.M.M
963 S.W. 2d 550 Avery vs. State

*

2. The jury was instructed that it must also be proven by clear and convincing evidence that termination of the parent-child relationship would be in the "best interest" of the child.In that connection, the instructions provided a list of factors to consider in determining the best interest of the child taken from Holley v. Adams. 544 S.W.2d 367, 371-72 (Tex. 1976).Marium has not challenged the propriety of the submission or the legal or factual suffi­ciency of evidence regarding best interest.

*

How could this happen to me