Make your own free website on
CPS reform


156 S.W.3d 574 IN RE S.A.P.
135 S.W. 3d 165 IN RE S.A.P.
80 S.W. 3d 232 IN RE J.M.M
963 S.W. 2d 550 Avery vs. State


2. The jury was instructed that it must also be proven by clear and convincing evidence that termination of the parent-child relationship would be in the "best interest" of the child.In that connection, the instructions provided a list of factors to consider in determining the best interest of the child taken from Holley v. Adams. 544 S.W.2d 367, 371-72 (Tex. 1976).Marium has not challenged the propriety of the submission or the legal or factual suffi­ciency of evidence regarding best interest.


How could this happen to me